Thanks to Lloyd Cellus for this appropriate comment from filmmaker Ken Loach.
It is customary to speak well of famous/infamous people when
they finally pass from this mortal coil. I’m sorry Mrs. Thatcher had dementia,
a truly horrifying disease I’d not wish on my worst enemy. But given that she is high on my list of enemies, I have no
further charity for Thatcher. My views of her are summed by the words from the
Munchkins in The Wizard of Oz: “Ding
dong, the witch is dead!” Thatcher, like Ronald Reagan, was a fraud
masquerading as a champion of the masses. And, like Reagan, she gets credit for
all sorts of things she had little to do with and avoids the blame for lots of
outrages for which she was.
Thatcher came to power at a time in which British
unemployment and inflation were rising. Like Reagan, she would later claim that
her policies reduced economic despair; in both cases, they took credit for
reducing levels that their policies made worse. Thatcher’s monetarist polices
drove inflation to 18% by 1980; when it came down to 8.6% in 1983, Thatcher
crowed like a proud rooster, though one wonders why given that 8.6% is still a
ruinous rate. Inflation did not really go down until 1990, her final year in
office, and then it was due to the 90% tax she had slapped on North Sea
oil—drilled off the coast of (you guessed it) Scotland. (In similar fashion,
nearly all of the economic gain under Reagan in the 1980s was due to new
technology: the computer revolution that didn’t exist when he ran for
president, soared by the mid-1980s.)
Thatcher was a devotee of Milton Friedman’s monetarism, a
tight fiscal policy that carefully regulates the amount of money in circulation
and makes loans hard to secure. It is a banker’s and investor’s delight, but a
nightmare if you want to buy a home or other high-ticket item. It is also
achieved by reigning in government spending, a task Thatcher achieved by privatizing
everything that wasn’t nailed down: British steel, most utilities, and parts of
British Rail—a system once the envy of the world and now a creaky collection of
independent lines whose poor service is rivaled only by its deplorable repair
record. The point was to move workers off the government payroll and throw them
to the mercies of the private—read lower-paid—sector. Nowhere was this done
with such abject cruelty as in mining. Numerous pits were closed and around 15%
of all miners lost their jobs. Want to hazard a guess as to where the worst hit
regions were? Try Yorkshire, Wales, and (of course!) Scotland. Thatcher also
achieved her goals by taking on labor unions because—well, there are so many
high-paying jobs in the burgeoning service sector. (Not!)Unemployment stood at
6.2% when she took office; it quickly jumped to 8.2% and workers rioted across
Great Britain. Unemployment wouldn’t go
back down to 6.2% until 1985. When Thatcher finally left office in 1990 and
passed the baton to her toady, John Major, the rate was again 8.2%. Does one
even need to discuss Bobby Sands and the Troubles in Northern Ireland, or Mrs.
Thatcher’s support for the Kymer Rouge government of Cambodia? Does one even
see these things amidst all the post-Falklands garlands with which she adorned
herself?
Thatcher and Major ingratiated themselves with banks,
financiers, aristocrats, and the “new money” Chablis-and-brie set. To put it in
terms popular these days, she (and Major never did establish his own identity)
was the prime minister of the 1%. A telling story: In 1997, Scots first voted
on devolution. The Tories packed up
Maggie Thatcher for a trip north, where she implored the populace, “No,
no—Scotland.” In a session in the Scots Parliament, Mrs. Thatcher was confronted
by an angry nationalist who enquired in his thickest rogue, “Isn’t it trrrrue,
Mrs. Thatcherrrr, that no one norrrth of the Tweed (the river separating the
Scottish Borders from England) voted for yewwww?” After some waffling she
admitted that Tories fared poorly in Scotland. To which she was told, “Rrrrright
then. Since yewwww don’t rrrepresent inyone herrrrre, perhaps yewwww ought to
buggerrrrr off back to London!” As folks
in that part of the world say, “Too right!”
I don’t know if it’s a good idea for Scotland to be
independent or not, but I do know this much: if a politician is the friend of
bankers, union-busters, and get-rich-quick speculators, they are no friend to
the 99%. I know that we often confuse leaders who are strong-headed with those that
are strong and that manicured press clippings and carefully crafted eulogies do
not compensate for decades of disregard, disrespect, and callousness directed
at society’s working stiffs. I know that you can’t rob Scots to reward Barclay
bankers and expect Scots to sing your praises. And I know that, for all its
travails, the world is a slightly better place because Margaret Thatcher isn’t
part of it.
There's no doubt that Mrs. Thatcher will be forever reviled by the Scottish people, and by most reasonable Brits. However, the street scenes I saw on TV, of people wearing party hats and blowing horns to celebrate her demise (this took place in good old Glasgow, of course) were disturbing to me. They reminded me of the Palestinians dancing in the streets when they heard about the towers coming down on 9/11. Let's just allow her to go quietly, and let it be.
ReplyDeleteIf as you say she's reviled by the Scottish people, then it's hardly surprising they were dancing in the street was it? I live in London and hated the sight of her. The tories will forever be in her shadow as all they see is behind them!
ReplyDelete