8/13/18

The Idiot Good, But Not Pulitizer Material


The Idiot (2017)
By Elif Batuman
Penguin, 423 pages.
★★★

The Idiot was the finalist for the Pulitzer Prize and I can see why. So why did I give it just three of five stars? This is the kind of novel people who care about serious literature want to love. How readers outside the academic world will receive it an open question. My take is that the book is impressively written, clever, and sometimes blindingly funny, but also self-indulgent and overly showy.

Parts of the novel are semi-autobiographical. Ms. Batuman is indeed a child of Turkish immigrants, attended Harvard, has a facility with languages, and is highly intelligent. The idiot it about how she began to know herself, a discovery that included the realization that she was destined to become a writer. She obtained a PhD in comparative literature from Stanford and has been able to follow her vocation.

Batuman's debut novel—she has also has penned a memoir and has toiled as a journalist—follows Selin, her thinly veiled alter ego, through her first year at Harvard, her first crush, and her transition from prolonged adolescence to adulthood. I wonder what people at Harvard will make of this book. By one reading, Harvard is indeed a holdout against dumbed-down curricula; from another it's a bastion of cluelessness when it comes to functioning in the everyday world. Selin's first year is spent studying linguistics and engaging in deep contemplation over topics such as Noam Chomsky's belief in transformational generative grammar versus the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis of language relativity. That's pretty heady stuff for anyone, let alone a first-year. Selin also studies Russian, Hungarian, and several other languages; she is multilingual, not bilingual. Her days are spent studying well into the next morning, trying to find time to spend with her new friend Svetlana, and pining over an older Hungarian student, Ivan. She's besotted with Ivan, which is odd given that much of her contract with him is through email, a new thing in 1995, when this book is set. Those conversations often wrestle with whether there is any meaning at all in language, and if it's possible to exist beyond words. Does this make Selin a towering intellect, or the book's namesake idiot?

One thing is certain; she's socially gauche. She knows next to nothing about being a young person, about campus culture, or affairs of the heart. Nor is she very good at practical things such as what to do in a bar, how to choose food, or how to tutor young people. Selin's journey, both physically and psychologically, takes her from New Jersey to Massachusetts, then to Paris, Hungary, and Turkey. She is often so far outside her element that her travails imbue this novel with humor bordering on absurdity. Much of the time Selin drifts through situations as it she's a character in an opéra bouffe. The reader wonders what she actually sees in Ivan, who frequently comes across as a self-centered jerk hiding behind a wall of half-baked ideas posing as profundity. Is Ivan really deep intellectually, or just in the barnyard sense?

Many of us recall early college years and can relate to Selin's feelings of uncertainty and struggles with self-esteem. I think, though, that Selin would have been a stronger character if cast as a first-generation Turkish immigrant, not one born in United States. It stretches credulity to imagine how anyone so interested in other languages and cultures could've gotten to Harvard having learned so little about of American society. Batuman's attempt to write around Selin's awkwardness through passing references to a broken home and a doting-but-domineering mother are not quite convincing.

I admired Bautman's honesty in casting her alter ego as neither heroine nor victim. Selin's attempts to tutor or teach are painful to read. I related to this, as I have personally witnessed former colleagues who needed to find other work, because they simply lacked the disposition to instruct others. On the other hand, the writer who must write has become a tired convention in modern literature. It's also self-serving. One feels as if Batuman is seeking affirmation for her life path, though no one disputed that in the first place. As a literary device, this contrivance means that some of the book's drama and revelations induce more shrugs than huzzahs.

There's also a matter of tone. If the goal is to show readers how new thoughts can blow a first-year student's mind, Batuman hits the target. Yet the tone is such that Batuman also appears to toot her own horn in ways that seek to convince us that she has a superior mind. Maybe she does, but is this necessary to advance the plot? As a title, The Idiot is ironic; Selin is both at sea, but she has more than adequate tools to make it to shore. Through her heavier emphasis on her intellectual confusion rather than coming to grips with growing up, Batuman will thrill academicians more than casual readers. As one who straddles the worlds of higher education and community life, I must give The Idiot a mixed review. It's not at all clear to me that Selin/Batuman has yet mastered life beyond the ivied walls of Harvard's Widener Library.

Rob Weir

-->

No comments:

Post a Comment