Milkman (2018)
By Anna Burns
Faber and Faber, 368
pages.
★★★
Back in 1996, Frank McCourt's Angela's Ashes was all the rage. It is a fine book, though a bleak
one. It's so grim that when she finished it, my wife hurled it across the room
and exclaimed, "Thank God I'm not Irish!"
I'm of Scottish extraction, so I'm in no position to judge
anyone else's forlorn past. I relate this anecdote because when it comes to
gloominess there are decided parallels between McCourt's memoir and Anna Burns'
Man Booker Prize-wining novel Milkman,
which is set in Northern Ireland during the "Troubles" of the 1970s. Officially
some 3,500 soldiers and civilians died during a British occupation of Northern
Ireland that badly mediated conflict between Catholics and Protestants. Untold
numbers simply disappeared and were likely victims of terrorist groups such as
the Irish Republican Army and the Ulster Defense League. This means that Milkman is not the sort of book likely
to be delivered to everyone's reading stands.
As Burns makes clear, it was a time of tragedy, paranoia,
and despair. She details a bifurcated world of "renouncers" and
"informers," shorthand for Catholic nationalists who were members of
or sympathetic to the IRA, and those who wanted Northern Ireland to remain part
of Great Britain rather than merge with the Republic of Ireland*. Burns introduces
us to some of the code phrases from the conflict: "Over the water" is
a pejorative term for England (or the United States), "over the
Border" is a stand-in for the Irish Republic, and "over the
road" means Protestant neighborhoods where a Catholic would not wish to
venture.
Milkman is
narrated–if that is the right term–by an unnamed 18-year-old Catholic woman who
lives is an unnamed neighborhood in an unnamed city, though we can safely infer
the locale is Belfast, as this from whence Ms Burns hails. None of the major
characters have names and are mostly referenced by their roles, quirks, and
status: nuclear boy, tablet girl, maybe boyfriend, beyond the pale, and so on.
Early in the book our narrator recites a litany of first names that instantly
label individuals as Irish, English, Catholic, or Protestant and that's all we
need to know. Burns wishes to immerse us in the politics and psychology of the
Troubles and presumably thought that proper names would divert attention to
personalities. It also serves her purpose of showing how growing up in such an
environment damaged psyches and (in a metaphorical sense) obliterated personalities;
humans were pawns in a bloody game they had to play whether or not they desired
to do so.
This is certainly the case of the narrator. She is
fatherless, one of her brothers was murdered, her mother thinks she's headed
for damnation, she is often called upon to take care of her "wee
sisters," and she's routinely berated by her older sisters and (surviving)
brothers-in-law. Like many 18-year-olds, her identity is a work in progress and
she indentifies as neither religious nor political. Good luck with that. She
has already called attention to herself for a dangerous habit: reading 19th
century novels while walking! In the eyes of the community, she could be an
informer passing secrets to British troops–perhaps through the book titles.
After all, many of those books are English. What else would explain the fact
that she's 18 and unmarried? She does have a "maybe boyfriend," but
he too has called the wrong kind of attention to himself. He's a gear-head who
collects auto parts, one of which the community learns is from a Bentley
(British). Rumor has it that there's a Union Jack label on it. Could things get
any worse? They do when a mysterious figure known as Milkman–reportedly a
41-year-old married IRA bigwig–begins to stalk her. The community begins to
whisper that the two are lovers. (He's so shadowy that some confuse him with the
actual milkman!)
We feel the weight of the world on our narrator, though I am
at a loss to explain how this book won the Man Booker Prize. Here's another
reason why many will shy away from Milkman:
it is written in stream of consciousness style. This certainly helps get inside
the mind of a confused 18-year-old, but it is a notoriously difficult form to
master. At her best, Burns illumines how a young woman trapped in a world of
suspicion, innuendo, and crippling social norms rockets from anger to
resignation to misanthropy in the blink of an eye. There is, however, no
disguising the fact that Milkman is
also often a frustrating and tedious read. Stream of consciousness writing
often impresses other novelists far more than it enthralls readers. Milkman also suffers from a jarring
tonal shift in the last quarter or so–an attempt to interject humor and in the
process humanize the narrator's tyrannical mother.
Should you give Milkman
a try? That depends upon what your purpose for reading might be. You can learn
a lot about gender expectations in the 1970s, what it means to live in a
warzone, and how causes are driven by inflamed passion rather than cool reason.
If you read carefully, you can infer a lot about the Troubles. If, however, you
like clarity, distinct characters, and at least a ray or two of hope, you might
be tempted to hurl Milkman across the
room. Or across the water.
Rob Weir
*Northern Ireland is riven by religion and economics. 48% of
its residents are Protestant and 45% are Catholic. Britain, however, is far
more prosperous than the Irish Republic, hence pragmatic materialism motivates
many Northern Irish residents to prefer the status quo over nationalist dreams
or religious sectarianism.
So glad I'm not the only one who found the streams of conscious writing difficult to deal with
ReplyDeleteNot an easy read. I'm trying to stick with it, and when I can work my way through the word maze, there are interesting historical things to learn, but it's also a great book to make me fall asleep at night!
ReplyDelete