THE UNKNOWN KNOWN (2013/14)
Directed by Errol Morris
History Films, 110 minutes, PG-13
* * * *
If you think Dick Cheney is scary, Rumsfeld is worse! |
This review
debuts a new blog feature: films I overlooked at the cinema for a variety of
reasons: a short run, too busy, tepid word-of-mouth, lost in the shuffle…. As I
recall, the Errol Morris film The Unknown
Known didn’t stick around very long, though I probably also ducked it
because it’s a documentary and I simply don’t find many of them visually
distinctive enough to justify increasingly high theater admission prices. But I
can say that this one is certainly worthy of adding to your online or rental
queue. Its look at the Machiavellian soul of former Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld is scarier than a slasher film and oilier than West Texas.
The very title
boots us down a slippery slope. Remember when—in the middle of hearings on
Monica Lewinsky-- Bill Clinton confounded wordsmiths with his statement, “It
depends upon what your definition of is, is?” Clinton is a paragon of clarity
compared to Rumsfeld, who defined the “unknown known” as “things you thought
you know that you didn’t know.” This tips us off immediately that Rumsfeld is a
different breed of cat than the last Secretary of Defense Morris interviewed:
Robert McNamara. In Morris’ Oscar-winning The
Fog of War (2004), McNamara admitted that Vietnam was a mistake. Don’t hold
your breath waiting for a Rumsfeld confessional on Iraq, Abu Ghraib, the body
armor conflab, or anything else. What we get is something more frightening—an
obviously brilliant man whose arrogance and ideology led him to abuse the
English language rather than consider that he might have erred. Think upon that
statement. Who among us has not been
spectacularly wrong on occasion? Not Rumsfeld—at least not in his mind. His
explanation for the reason we found no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? “An
absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” If such a statement doesn’t
chill you, ponder upon Morris’s follow-up query as to whether such a belief was
carte blanche to pursue any belief at any time as if evidence was irrelevant.
Rumsfeld has a standard response whenever he paints himself into a corner:
“You’re chasing the wrong rabbit on this one.”
In many ways,
Rumsfeld was prepped for such obfuscating arrogance. Like many rightwing
ideologues, he came to power (U.S. Congress 1963-69) in opposition to the
counterculture and social change movements of the Sixties—as befitted a
50s-bred conservative (Eagle Scout, World War II, Princeton, Georgetown Law).
His big break came when Nixon appointed him to head the Office of Economic
Opportunity and then as ambassador to NATO. Like Nixon, Rumsfeld recorded
everything he thought or did. Although Rumsfeld dismisses personal tapings as
nothing more than organizing thoughts in progress, the 20,000+ sharply worded
memos he sent as George W. Bush’s Secretary of Defense (2001-06) instead suggest
an inflated sense of self-importance and, perhaps, a dash of Nixonian paranoia.
(Rumsfeld also served as Gerald Ford’s Chief of Staff and then his Secretary of
Defense from 1975-77. He also mentored Dick Cheney!)
Part of Errol
Morris’ brilliance lies with his ability to stay in the background rather than
grandstanding like Michael Moore. He allows us to hear (and often see via
cutouts and superimposed script) Rumsfeld’s own words. And what words they are.
Rumsfeld is, at turns, erudite and dissembling. He is clearly a highly
intelligent individual, but also one so enamored with his own cleverness that
he occasionally outwits himself. The film ends with Rumsfeld unable to decipher
correctly his own “unknown known” formulation or explain why he agreed to be
interviewed—a fitting end for one who was fired in 2006 after he ran out of
excuses.
Morris’
documentary is equal parts compelling and chilling. Not since Henry Kissinger
have we seen a figure of such intellect guided by such an amoral compass. I
can’t promise you will enjoy this
film, but I can state that it’s an object lesson in why so many American
citizens are cynical about politics. It’s also a testament on how a skilled
director can document without preaching. Morris is like a polished prosecutor
who allows the accused to convict himself.—Rob
Weir
No comments:
Post a Comment