WOMAN IN GOLD (2015)
Directed by Simon Curtis
Weinstein Company, 110 minutes, PG-13
* * *
The first thing
to know about Woman in Gold is that
it’s much better than a lot of its reviews. The second is that it’s not nearly
as good as it ought to be. It is a story about art looted by the Nazis during
World War II but, in this case, not just any art—we’re talking paintings by
Gustav Klimt, including his famed Woman
in Gold, a piece considered by many to be part of the Austrian soul.
Painting titles
are often conveniently anonymous. The “woman” had a name: Adele Bloch-Bauer,
and before she was a national icon she was a beloved family member whose
portrait hung in the apartment of her uncle, Frederick Altmann, until the Nazis
removed it and the remaining Jewish Altmanns–and only the former to
safekeeping. The film follows the efforts of Adele’s niece, Maria Altmann
(Helen Mirren), to recover Adele’s portrait (and four other Klimts). To say
that Vienna’s Belvedere Gallery and the Austrian government would rather
whitewash their Holocaust past than part with “Woman in Gold,” is to do
disservice to the depths of their heinousness.
The movie is
essentially a series of archival searches and courtroom appearances that take place
in Vienna, Los Angeles, and Washington, DC, and involve Maria, her nephew
lawyer Randol Schoenberg (Ryan Reynolds), and Austrian investigative reporter
Hubertus Czernin (Daniel Bruhl). The film tries very hard to build drama and
that may have been the wrong approach. Anyone who cares about art already knows
how the drama ends—in 2006, “Woman in Gold” was returned to Maria Altmann,
which is why today it hangs in New York City’s Neue Gallery.
This begs a
question: Would this have been a more compelling film if it had charted a
different course? By choosing the most conservative path—instead of, for
instance, looking at how the art world collaborated to do an end around the
Holocaust—director Simon Curtis essentially opted for one of film’s most tired
and trite memes: the Big Courtroom Scene. There’s nothing audacious about that unless
you want to give Curtis props for having several of them in the same movie. His
boldest move was to construct a Supreme Court hearing that is nothing like a
real one, presumably to enhance tension, though it may have just been an excuse
to give Jonathan Pryce a juicy cameo as Chief Justice William Rehnquist.
The acting is
mostly solid, with Mirren trying her best (and not quite succeeding) to assume
a German accent and give Meryl Streep a run for accent mastery. (Meryl still
wears the crown!) Mirren is steely and, by turns, vulnerable and stubborn.
Reynolds, a much lesser actor, is less convincing as a lawyer; he’s simply too
soft and unfocused. Elizabeth McGovern is much better in her cameo role as
Judge Florence-Marie Cooper, and Antje Traue is simply radiant in the
non-speaking role of Adele. Charles Dance and Katie Holmes also appear in
cameos. In the end, though, what one notices about all the principal actors is
that none of them is Jewish. Is this a problem? Yes; it probably is—we’re
decades past the time in which it was routine for actors to dress in
cross-cultural garb.
Gustav Klimt's 'Woman in Gold' |
There are other
liberties taken. Czernin, not Schoenberg, located the key documents and
notified Maria Altmann that she had a legitimate restitution claim. More
problematic is that key Austrian politicians and art world figures appear as
composites with fictional names. Doesn’t this add a new layer of complicity and
injustice to an already sordid tale? Other small details are changed for
dramatic effect: Maria didn’t leave Austria until her father died, so the
tearful farewell scene is a contrivance. There was never a time limit on stolen
Nazi art—another contrivance.
This is an
amazing story rather ham-handedly told. By opting for clichés and
drama-enhancements, the film is akin to a surgically enhanced model draped in
silk to hide the droops and scars. When reality hands you a juicy tale, it’s
best not to muck it up with chemical additives. Woman in Gold is worth watching, but be aware that you’re beholding
gilding, not 24-karat gold.
Rob Weir
No comments:
Post a Comment