I Give It to
You (August 4, 2020)
By Valerie
Martin
Penguin Random
House, 304 pages.
★★★
Valerie Martin is among
my favorite novelists, but I must give a mixed review to her upcoming I
Give It to You. There is much to like about any novel set partly in Tuscany,
and Martin has a gift for storytelling, though this time plot lines and plot
holes too often overlap. Martin also leaves herself open to charges of class
insensitivity.
The novel opens in
1983, when Jan Vidor, an English professor at a Pennsylvania college, books a
vacation stay on the grounds of a Tuscan country house. Her plan is to work on
a new novel, but that scheme veers in different directions when she arrives at
Villa Chiara (“bright villa”). The grounds bespeak wealth, but of a faded variety
that starkly contrast with Jan’s light and airy quarters in a converted out-building.
Days pass before she meets her hostess, Beatrice Bartolo Doyle, whose family
owns the villa. Beatrice (Bee-ah-traay-chee) is an Italian professor at
a small college and lives part of the year in New York State, which she
dislikes. (She doesn’t seem to like teaching much either.) Jan’s fascination
for Tuscany dovetails with Beatrice’s devotion to her native soil and forms the
basis for a long friendship.
I Give It to You is a multi-generational chronicle of the
slow decline of the aristocratic Salviati/Bartolo family. Jan infers that the
Mussolini years (1922-45) somehow diminished family fortunes, but surviving family
members are silent or vague about what happened, which side they were on, and
why Beatrice’s gentle uncle Sandro was killed during the waning days of World
War II. This is odd, as Beatrice shares intimate details of being a graduate
student in Boston and of her brief marriage to an Irish American man whose surname
she and her son bear. Emily Dickinson famously wrote, “Tell the truth but tell
it slant.” Tell it slant around a writer and she will try to straighten it,
even if it takes years. Martin asks us to consider a writer’s craft. Should
stories and biographies–told and untold–be used as raw material for one’s own
yarn?
Jan is the book’s
narrator, though mostly a passive and non-judgmental one. It is unclear whether
she is also an unreliable one. That’s fine, as a major strength of I Give It
to You is the ambiguous questions it poses. When someone answers a
novelist’s query with a family story and says, “I give it to you,” does she
merely mean she is recounting a tale, or is she giving permission for the
novelist to do with it as she wishes? Does the dialogue we read–the chapters
skip between real time and the past–represent Beatrice’s actual words and
stories, or are they sections of the book Jan ultimately writes?
In my estimation
Martin misses the boat by making Jan an underdeveloped character. We know little
of who she is other than a curious observer. How can she not be appalled by the
aristocratic haughtiness of Beatrice and her cousin Luca? This is especially
evident in their expectations that those living on the estate should be forever
deferential, and their expressed outrage when commoners show distressing signs
of raising their own status. Along similar lines, how can Jan not make
more of the fact that David, Beatrice’s adult son, is a pompous ass who has
inherited his mother’s sense of privilege? Readers are free to choose whether Jan
is clueless, starstruck by nobility, living vicariously through Beatrice, or as
heartless as her erstwhile friend.
Novelists, like
poets, are often introverts but they tend to reflect upon the human condition.
If Martin would have us see Jan as both inquisitive and a relentless
researcher, how can she be so obtuse? There is a logical disconnect in the
small questions Jan asks in the name of uncovering the past, whilst ignoring
big (and obvious) ones about the present. How can social class never come up in
discussion? How is it that Jan never considers whether her friendship with
Beatrice is deeper than the bottom of a wine glass? She doesn’t, thus the novel’s
final lines ring hollow and false.
I Give It to You has been billed as a novel about “writing,
friendship, family and betrayal.” Be forewarned that “writing” is the only
uncloaked part of this equation, and even it raises more questions than it
answers. One senses that Martin has too many devices in the fire, not the least
of which is that Americans in Tuscany have gotten generous workouts in
literature. Martin herself has previously trod upon Tuscan turf in Italian
Fever (1999). Despite being a different kind of book, the latter also involves
a villa with secrets, the intoxicating effects of Italy, and a buttoned-down
American writer. There is also the matter of a trans-Atlantic novel–parts take
place in Boston, Cape Cod, New York State, and Pennsylvania–that strain for
vitality outside of Italy. Likewise, the relationship between Beatrice and Jan
seems only to bloom under a Tuscan sun.
I Give It to You has fascinating
diversions, especially for those lucky enough to have visited Tuscany. These
are, however, exactly that: diversions. It’s not a bad novel–Martin is too
talented to write rubbish–and it bears saying that it holds one’s attention.
Nonetheless, I Give It to You is a case in
which the whole is less than the sum of its parts.
Rob Weir
No comments:
Post a Comment