THE GRATEFUL DEAD (and others)
Dawn of the Dead
Sexy Intellectual, 2012, 138 mins.
The Grateful Dead machine continues to pump out merch. Even
diehard Deadheads admit that Grateful Dead films stretch the definition of
surrealism, hence Dawn of the Dead will
come a revelation–it’s easily the most comprehensible film project ever done on
Jerry Garcia and the lads. The hardcore may not be as pleased to see their
heroes as just part of a larger drama rather the movers and shakers of all
things groovy.
The Grateful Dead is placed solidly within a broader
context: folk music, jug bands, avant-garde modernism, and emerging subcultures.
We see the Dead emerge from late 50s/early 60s ethos in which the Beats slowly
yielded to hippies, with a big assist given by the Merry Pranksters. The film
smartly documents the musical evolution in the Bay area, a reminder that acid
rock owed as much inspirational debt to protest singers, bluegrass pickers,
experimental composers, and jazz artists as Stanley Owsley’s prowess with a
chemistry set. Once the Bay area scene unfolds, the film makes The Dead central,
but the video gives lots of screen time to others, including: Monterrey Pop
artists, The Jefferson Airplane, Janis Joplin, The Charlatans, and Quicksilver
Messenger Service. Members of the latter two groups have as much to say about
what went down as Dead insiders such as Rock Scully, Phil Lesh, and Bob Weir. We
witness the rise of mid-‘60s utopian dreams, which culminated in Family Dog
Productions, the Diggers, Bill Graham and Fillmore West, and the 1967 Summer of
Love. We also see the magic dissipate amidst San Francisco’s post-‘67 urban
chaos and the 1969 Altamont festival, The film is one of the best explanations
I’ve viewed of the Americana musical retreat beaten by former psychedelic
artists fleeing to the relative sanity of Marin County and beyond. Overall the
film is a dizzying tour of musical (and hippie) milestones between 1960 through
1971.
As a musical history it is absolutely first-rate. Its major
weakness is that it could stand to lose a few music critics in favor of
consulting some social historians. There is an unintentional reductionism to
the film in that the Bay area is viewed as way more representative of the 1960s
than it really was. There is not question that San Francisco occupied a
mythical psychic space for those seeking the Flower Child vibe, but that was
just one of many paths followed in the Sixties. The filmmakers elide the
counterculture, politics, and ideology, and fail to tell us that America often
looked quite different once one strayed beyond Haight-Ashbury. There is also a
tendency to view all young people as homogeneous, as if hippies were also politicos,
for instance. Many–including the notoriously apolitical Grateful Dead–were
quite separate, just as the East Coast scene was often very different from the
West Coast. (This film culminates in 1971, but The Grateful Dead are not a major
phenomenon in the East until later in the 1970s.) Dawn of the Dead is a superb musical chronicle, but don’t trust the
social commentary.--Rob Weir