11/23/18

The Good Wife a Thoughtful Older Novel to Discover


The Good Wife (2005)
By Stewart O'Nan
Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 308 pages.
★★★★

I keep a "Notes" app on my phone with a list of books I plan to read. Four cellphones ago—somewhere between Nokia, Samsung, and iPhone—I lost my note to read Stewart O'Nan's The Good Wife. Recently I walked into the town library and there it was—The Good Wife resting on the to-be-shelved cart. Better late than never, which is ironic as the novel is constructed around the very question of how long one should wait before moving on.

The titular character is Patty Dickerson. She and hubby Tommy are about to welcome their first child into the world. Like many 20-somethings, the Dickersons are legally adults, but not entirely grown up and certainly not financially set. On a fateful night, Tommy celebrates scoring a goal in a hockey game by having a few too many at a bar with his best buddy, Gary. The two break into a supposedly empty house with the goal of stealing some guns in the possession of old lady Wagner. As it transpires, Mrs. Wagner was home, and they end up killing the 79-year-old when she startles them. It was all an accident, Tommy assures Patty, and things will work out soon.

Welcome to blue-collar life in Owego, New York—a real place, by the way—where neither Tommy nor Gary have the coin to hire fancy lawyers. Tommy chooses the path of honor and rejects the district attorney's offer to turn on Gary. Alas, Gary takes that deal and walks, while Tommy gets 20-years to life. Should Patty also walk away? That's easier said than done; she's young, pregnant, financially strapped, and has only a high school diploma. The Good Wife follows Patty through the next 27 years of her life as she tries to piece together a very different future than the one she envisioned for herself and her son Casey. The novel is also an insider's look at blue-collar life, dead-end jobs, tricky family dynamics, self-discovery, and temptations avoided and embraced. It's also a gaze into the New York State penal system—from Auburn to Danemora to Bare Hill.  

O'Nan doesn't dazzle with poetic prose; his strength is placing us inside Patty's mind and circumstances so that we feel the full weight of being dealt a bad hand. O'Nan wisely says almost nothing of the actual crime. By making Tommy's culpability ambiguous, readers are forced to see things through Patty's eyes, not those of abstract ethics. So do we root for Tommy because Patty does, or do we hope he rots? That's another O'Nan sleight of hand. It's very easy to judge anonymous "murderers," but what if you're not sure? And what if you know the criminal? What if that person was your own spouse or flesh and blood?

O'Nan's tale is the best kind of morality tale: one that refuses to offer easy answers. He invites readers to contemplate what they would do in Patty's situation. And then there's that whole social class thing to consider. You know, class, the Great American Denial. It won't take you long to realize that social class determines how many aces you have up your sleeve when that proverbial bad hand is dealt. Most folks don't have any; sociologists speak of "life chances," the correlation between access to resources and the kind of life one will lead. O'Nan dares to suggest, though, that resiliency might be a potential wild card.

Call this novel equal parts grim and hopeful, provocative and touching, breezy and gripping. It's quite a road trip—a series of them actually. The physical road trips are still another what-would-you-do conundrum. Among Patty's travails is the fact that prisons are not places where you can log onto Expedia and book a room. When Tommy is in Auburn, he's just an hour away; when he's in Bare Hill (Malone), he's more than 4 ½ hours distant and Patty doesn't have the money to waste on hotel rooms. Would you drive more than 9 hours for an afternoon visit? How often?

Is Patty really the good wife? There are other possibilities: dupe, desperate, deluded…. You get to choose. And that, ultimately, is what makes this a strong (and timeless) novel. O'Nan knocks down easy rationalizations, calls numerous moral judgments into question, and then trusts his readers to draw their own conclusions. I was glad I did my time and got to enjoy this book.

Rob Weir

-->

11/21/18

I Evacuated Lauren Goff's Florida


Florida (2018)
By Lauren Groff
Penguin/Riverhead Books, 275 pages.
★★

There is something irresistible about well-written great stories. There is something very resistible about well-written books with mediocre stories, which is why I bailed on Lauren Groff's Florida 200 pages in.

This collection of tales has been much praised by critics, but one gets the sense that Groff is writing to impress them, not engage readers. I concede that Groff knows how to write. Many of the passages in Florida are as finely crafted as poetry. In "The Midnight Zone," a woman concusses herself trying to change a light bulb and lies on the floor as a storm gathers. Groff writes, "The wind rose again and it had personality; it was in a sharpish, meanish mood. It rubbed itself against the cabin and played at the corners and broke sticks off the trees and tossed them at the roof so they jigged down like creatures with strange and scrabbling claws. The wind rustled its endless body against the door." That's fine writing, but it's not in the service of much. Great writing only takes you so far if you don't have a compelling narrative upon which to hang it. That lack is, for instance, what makes James Joyce's Ulysses one of the most impressive unreadable books of all time. To return to Florida, Groff's weakly scaffolded stories reminded me that if I want stylish language alone, I've got a lot of superb poetry residing in my bookcases.

One critic has called Florida a psychogeography, an apt term. But I found that I just didn't care all that much about the Sunshine State if depleted of characters with enough depth to make me care about them. Moreover, there are so many repeated tropes that the tales seemed more like almanac readings than fiction. Most stories feature a character or two—usually a woman and/or children—in danger. That danger is often expressed as weather (blinding rain, oppressive heat, hurricanes, floods), external threats (snakes, gators, panthers), or personal demons (ex-spouses, ominous strangers, booze). Terror comes in three flavors, real, invisible, and imagined. When children appear, one is usually airy, lovable, and bright, the other its evil twin. And children are often in peril. In "Dogs Go Wolf," for example, two children are simply abandoned and might actually starve to death. A chapter titled "Snake Stories" is still another example of why we need more than just burnished prose. It is just nine pages long, but there are thirteen meditations within it. Some are about actual reptiles, but others veer into musings on original sin, women, flora, an injured child, and divorce. Snakes, it seems, are both animals and metaphors. "All the Earth's Corners" literally fills a house with snakes, but they set the stage for a mother who ultimately walks away from her son and ex-husband. Is she meant to be Eve, or an archetypal Bad Mother? I probably wouldn't even ask that question if the characters were better developed.

Physical, psychological, and metaphorical isolation is another Groff subtheme. This suggests that perhaps she underwrote characters to accentuate remoteness. I did not find this to be clever. In my estimation overwriting is no substitution for underdevelopment. By the time page 200 rolled around, I did something I seldom do: put down the book without finishing. My personal rule is to give up on an uninteresting book around the 1/3 mark; if I've invested the effort to slog through 70% of a book, it seems wasteful not to complete the last third. But it became clear to me that Florida was not going to become H. P. Lovecraft goes to the bayou.

I liked earlier Groff works such as Delicate Edible Birds and adored Arcadia, a book that testifies that Groff does know how to tell a story. Beginning with Fates and Furies, though, Groff appears to be working harder at being thought of as literary than of being engaging. That novel was, like Florida, well written and the characters were (just) memorable enough for me to plow through to the end. Not this time. Groff might do well to realize that the bulk of her readers are decades removed from college. I'd prefer that a novel be both literary and entertaining. If you make me choose between those two qualities, though, the song I dial up is "Let Me Entertain You." Florida was a swamp I didn't wish to traverse.

Rob Weir 

11/20/18

Dave Tamkin is Keeping It Real

Dave Tamkin
Live @ eTown
★★★★

Dave Tamkin is a Boulder-based (by way of Chicago) acoustic musician armed with a strong tenor voice and some fine guitar skills. He has shared the stage with luminaries such as Donovan, Guster, Peter Mulvey, and The Violent Femmes. His new live-performance EP is a very good reason to get to know him up close and personal. It is both energetic and has something to say—much like a few of his personal influences: Martin Sexton, Keb 'Mo, and Wilco.

Tamkin often travels with a band, but this solo performance is as stripped down to the basics. "Bleeding Orange" comes at you with a riff that sounds like an acoustic intro to a Who song, but it frames a song on a classic theme: being on the road, wondering if it's worth it—"Building dreams with wire strings and napkins"—and hoping "just to find my way back home." He's aware there's nothing new about any of this—"Generations sing my story"—but he lays it out with earnest longing. One of the things I particularly like about Tamkin is that what you hear is what you get. You can sample what he calls his "rhythmic acoustic" sound on "Fly Me." He's putting it all out there, even though we can hear in the background that not all audience members are tuned in. Another stringed percussive example can be heard on a song titled "Tuesday," with vocal phrasings and lyric snippets that hint at Paul Simon. The instrumentation can only be described as robust. If you think any of this stuff is easy, listen to how Tamkin builds "Drift" to what sounds as if it will be a big crescendo at 2:30, but then pops a few notes that take down the tempo as prelude to a flying spray of runs and ringing strings that take us to another level.

This is unapologetic folk music—the kind where a guy with great guitar licks stands in front of an audience and sings his guts out in the hope someone is listening carefully. He got my attention. He deserves yours. Check out the entire EP at NoiseTrade. If you don't know this site, it allows you to give a donation directly to the musician instead of the .006 cents per song an artist earns on Spotify.

Rob Weir

11/19/18

Leave No Trace Leaves a Huge Imprint upon Viewers


Leave No Trace (2018)
Directed by Debra Granik
Bleecker Street, 109 minutes, PG
★★★★★

Looking for the next John Sayles? Debra Granik might, in fact, be better, as she avoids Sayles' need to tick PC boxes and her characters have considerably more depth.   

Granik's Leave No Trace is a strong contender as the best American film of the year. Have you ever heard of a film receiving a 100% rating on Rotten Tomatoes? This one did. Its only flaw is that far too few people have seen it. This could be because Granik is an uncompromising director who steers clear of forced happy endings and simplistic right/wrong scenarios. She is, after all, the director who gave us Winter's Bone, which got my vote as best film of 2010, and not coincidentally launched the career of a then little known actress named Jennifer Lawrence. Without Winter's Bone, Lawrence isn't Katniss Everdeen, and she would have been at best a bit player in films such as Silver Linings Playbook or American Hustle. She certainly would not have become the highest paid actress in Hollywood.

If there is any justice, what happened to Lawrence will befall young Thomasin Harcourt McKenzie, the co-star of Leave No Trace. We meet her in the thick-growth rain forest near Portland, Oregon, where she and her father Will (Ben Foster) live as survivalists. By the world's standards, "Tom" and Will are homeless trespassers within a sprawling public park. That's not how either of them would describe themselves. Tom's mother died when she was too young to remember her and she is deeply bonded with her father. Will is a PTSD veteran who simply can't fit into regimented society. He exhibits symptoms of being a sociopath, but he's no psychopath; he has a conscience and loves Tom deeply. She is his best "buddy" and his tangential link to the broader world. Will and Tom live a back-to-the-garden existence in which they practice wild crafting, foraging, camouflaging, and survivalist drills designed to hide from those who would reveal their woodland camps. When they need provisions they can't find or make, they walk into Portland, where Will visits the VA for pain pills that he promptly sells. Then it's back to the woods. This is one aspect of the film's title: the desire to live beyond civilization's notice.

American society is not, however, kind to those who wish to live like Will and Tom. Shouldn't Tom be in school? Forget the fact that Will's private tutorials place Tom well beyond the levels of other 13-year-olds. It's not a spoiler to say that Will and Tom will endure several coerced-but-necessary attempts to integrate into society. Granik deftly contrasts state on nature mores with those of organized society, and she doesn't glamorize one over the other. At one point Will is working on a Christmas tree farm and we watch him slowly burn over the wasteful consumption of natural resources, the regimen of work, and lost independence. There is a scene of a sacred dance inside a church that is cringe-worthy and raises questions about which way of life is more Edenic. Tom adjusts a bit better, though she is drawn more to a 4-H kid who raises show rabbits. When Will and Tom bolt for Washington State, it's akin to a Biblical flight into the Wilderness. Circumstances will eventually lead Will and Tom to an RV community that's about as off-the-grid as one can get and still be considered part of society. But can either of them adjust to any sort of rule-bound living?

This is an astonishing film. Foster gives dignity to those suffering from PTSD. His nuanced performance plumbs the various ways in which trauma is made manifest; his is a quiet malady that somehow is more affecting than clichéd Hollywood tropes in which a vet "snaps" and goes rogue. Will knows he's troubled, but his desire is to leave no trace. I can only compare his final choice to that of James Allen in the 1932 classic I Am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang.

As good as Foster is, Ms. McKenzie is better. She's so convincing as an American teen that it surprises to learn she's a New Zealander who buried her accent. * She also skillfully navigates playing a 13-year-old—she was 17 when filming began—especially those moments in which we see her poised between childhood dependency and adolescent identity formation. Her shift toward autonomy comes at us in dribbles, not a melodramatic burst. When she tells her father, "What's wrong with you is not what's wrong with me," she does so with such poignancy and tenderness that it rips out your heart. She also has great physical poise. In Leave No Trace, she seems long, lithe, and lean, though she's actually short of five and a half feet.

Let me also sing the praises of Dale Dickey, who plays an RV park resident named Dale. You may know her for her role as Ree, the ominous nearly feral mountain woman in Winter's Bone. Dickey has a plastic face that allows her to wordlessly convey a wide array of emotion—from deep caring to cut-the-bullshit. Give Granik credit once more for casting good actors for small roles. A final kudo goes to cinematographer Michael McDonough for making the forest and weather so palpably real that we are tempted to personify and capitalize Nature as if it were a character on its own.

Rob Weir

*If you've seen Peter Jackson's adaptation of The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies (2014), Thomasin played Astrid, a young girl living in Lake-town, which was destroyed by Smaug.

11/16/18

Manhattan Beach Far Better than Jennifer Egan's Prize Winner


Manhattan Beach  (2017)
By Jennifer Egan
Scribner's, 433 pages.
★★★★

I held off reading Jennifer Egan's new novel Manhattan for a reason that will surprise some. In 2011, Ms. Egan won a Pulitzer, the National Book Award, and the Critics Circle Award for A Visit From the Goon Squad, a book I thought was, at best, mediocre. At the time, I speculated that it won awards because aging critics out of touch with the social media references Egan employed were trying to flex their sagging hipster muscles. I simply did not get the hype around Egan.

Now I get it; Jennifer Egan is a spellbinding storyteller. Egan captures Greater New York in the 1930s and 1940s in ways that make us feel as if we are perusing halftone newspaper photographs through a powerful microscope that brings the images into sharp focus. Egan tells numerous stories by intertwining three main characters: Anna Kerrigan as a child and as a young adult; Anna's conniving father, Eddie; and the shadowy Dexter Styles, who is linked to the mob.

The book opens in 1934, when the Kerrigans were like millions of other families: scrapping by during the Great Depression. Eddie isn't content with mere survival, plus his youngest daughter, Lydia, is a brain-damaged paraplegic. Although Anna assumes maternal care for Lydia—their mother is traditional and ineffectual—Lydia's needs strain the budget. Eddie is a scheme-of-the-month kind of guy who often recruits the unwitting aid of Anna in his plans. Even when these ventures go awry, the excitement of the chase makes him a hero in young Anna's eyes. She recalls one of the best days of her life: a trip to the ocean, Brooklyn's Manhattan Beach, where her dad pays an unexplained visit to Dexter Styles at his well-appointed beach house. For young Anna, it was like a trip to Versailles. Her worst day, though, was the one in which her father disappeared. His name is never again mentioned, though Anna cannot help but wonder why he left.

Move the clock forward to 1942. Anna is 19, World War Two is just underway, the Brooklyn Naval Yard is humming in an around-the-clock effort to rebuild the US fleet destroyed at Pearl Harbor, and Anna has secured a mind-numbing job of measuring metal parts with a micrometer. Rosie the Riveter she isn't! But she is a single woman living on her own with a little bit of pocket money. She's also naïve—until she meets free-spirited Nell, who introduces her to dance halls, movies, stylish clothing, makeup, and nightclubs. At one of the latter, she recognizes Styles, whom she finds dashing. Plus, she eventually concludes he knows something about her father.

Anna has another agenda; she wants to move on from her job and the disdain of the prodnose married women who assume she's sleeping with her supervisor. She has her heart set on becoming the first female diver at the shipyard. No one wants Anna in such a job, least of all Lt. Axel, who is in charge of training divers. In those days, diving was even more hazardous than it sounds. A diver had to don around 200 pounds of sweaty gear, overcome the claustrophobia of having a helmet screwed onto a metal collar, dive into murky waters, and be able to use tools while wearing inflated gloves. Additional worries included the fact that one was tethered to a topside hand-pumped air hose; if it or the suit malfunctioned, death was a near certainty. There was the additional problem of needing to decompress slowly to avoid sickness or a fatal embolism. But Anna perseveres.

Egan flips us back and forth in time, juxtaposing Eddie's misadventures with Anna's coming of age and loss of innocence. Egan offers a nuanced look at the war years. For a brief moment, a window opened and scores of formerly tradition-bound women jumped out. Once set free, however, many women struggled with things other than sexism. We all know that many wartime Rosie the Riveters—the collective symbol for all women working in hitherto male work domains—were pushed back to the workplace margins once the war ended. What we seldom discuss is life off the clock. Egan doesn't make Anna into Everywoman, but she does give us rich food for thought.

The mystery of Eddie's disappearance is woven into all of this, as is an inside look at the Merchant Marines at sea and organized crime on the ground. Styles is the pivot around which Egan's story treads spin. A tale such as Egan's could easily come off as a force fit of three separate stories, but Egan expertly ties the threads and hides the stitches.

There are a few missteps. Some of her secondary characters—John Dunellen, Charlie Voss, Lt. Axel, a black bosun, Mr. Q, Badger, and even Nell—are sketchy rather than fully realized. I can live with the under development of the first six, but it's odd that Nell also eventually goes AWOL in the novel. In addition, Anna's aunt/Eddie's sister, Brianne—said to be a kept mistress—has deus ex machina qualities. Some readers may, in fact, view the eucatastrophic manner through which Egan resolves Anna's dilemmas as contrived.  Still, Egan's tales are gripping, the main characters are unforgettable, the book is meticulously researched, and the prose sparkling.

If, like me, you were underwhelmed by a Visit From the Goon Squad, give Manhattan Beach a try. Egan deserves great credit for not resting on her laurels. She took her time and wrote a novel that is both satisfying and has something to say.

Rob Weir


-->

11/15/18

Rad Trads, Alex Fry, Brotherly, Ferdinand the Bull



Rad Trads, On Tap

If you like your music big and robust, the Rad Trads are for you. This Brooklyn-based quintet has been billed as "The Band meets Miles Davis." The vibe is much more Band than Miles, but Davis gets tossed at them because two Rad Trad members—Patrick Sargent and Michael Fatum—air it out on sax and trumpet respectively. If you're a concert hound, you may have seen these folks open for acts such as Buddy Guy, Lake Street Dive, and The Lone Bellow, but they are worthy of headlining on their own. Take a listen to tracks such as "Wishing Well" or GoodLuck Unto 'Ya" and you'll start thinking of Levon Helm, though "My Place" is more like funk rock. My favorite track is "Thumbtack," with an opening early 60s feel and drum sticks banging on rims. It doesn't stay in that groove; the horns make sure of that. The  overall vibe is NOLA rock. But maybe we ought to call this mélange rock, as the Rad Trads serve up everything from soul to jazz to psychedelia. ★★★★

Alex Fry, Taste of Eden

Alex Fry has bounced from LA to New York and back to her home turf in Arkansas. Taste of Eden is a collection of songs that document her journeys, as well as stuff such as love, loss, and feminism. Of the last of these, check out, "Superhero Girl" with its declaration, "I'm going to save the world."  Fry calls herself an indie artist. In her case, it's the pop end of that spectrum. At her finest, her tones are vaguely reminiscent of a young Nanci Griffith. You'll hear traces of this in her piano-based "Anchor," a fragile, pretty song. "Fool" is more soulful, though the project's dominant mood is, as noted, indie pop. For my money, her lovely voice showcases best on quiet material. ★★★

Brotherly, The Bound

First things first: Don't confuse this Nashville-based ensemble with a British duo of the same name. Brotherly is Dale and DJ Liscomb, siblings that drifted apart after their father's death, but reconnected years later. They are sometimes compared to Weezer, though their vocals are stronger and the music generally has more distinct melodies. "Bound Stripped Down but Not Out" probes some of the dark times each has had: "We slip/We fall/I'm down." This is a song that begins as quiet as a museful folk song but builds with increasingly heavier bass lines and fuzzed out guitar. That's also the formula on "I Don't Want to Know," which gets rock out noisy. "My God" also features crunch chords, though this one could be toned down a bit, as the lyrics are lost in the mix. I listened to it several times and am still not entirely sure what it's about. But we sure can hear the brotherly bond on The Bound. ★★★

NOTE: The link to the EP is above. The Liscombs might consider choosing a band name. It's quite a slog to find them online as Brotherly, and the way things work these days, if you're not online.... 

Ferdinand the Bull, Painting Over Pictures

Perhaps some of you grew up with the children's book or cartoons devoted to Ferdinand the Bull, the horned bovine who'd rather pick flowers than fight. Now that you're older, you can enjoy an indie band of that name that's been around since 2013? FTB has a new recording, Painting Over Pictures, the band's most ambitious project to date. This Pennsylvania-bred, Midwest-based quartet is built around the lyrics, lead vocals, and acoustic guitar of Nick Snyder, and the mandolin, electric guitar, and harmonies of Bryce Radideau. The new record also tosses in some cello, percussion, and even some horns. FTB is sometimes compared to Arcade Fire or the Avett Brothers, though Iron and Wine is probably a better fit. Call it a mix of indie and contemporary folk. Give a listen to  "4:30 am,"  "New England," and "Susannah." I picked these three to see if you agree with my assessment. I saw a short set of FTB and have listened to the new record and back catalogue stuff. I like this band, but a lot of their repertoire is hard to replicate on stage. ★★★  (Compare the last song to this version.)

Rob Weir

11/14/18

The Leisure Seeker Flawed, but Well Acted Film of Memory Loss


The Leisure Seeker (2017)
Directed by Paolo Virzi
Sony Picture Classics, 112 minutes, R (language, elder sex)
★★★

The Leisure Seeker is a comedy/romance/drama constructed around a road trip by a couple that knows that the Golden Years are about to become Lights Out for Eternity. It follows the sojourn of John and Ella Spencer (Donald Sutherland and Helen Mirren) as they wend their way from suburban Boston to Key West in a 1975 Winnebago long ago christened the “Leisure Seeker” by the couple’s now adult children, Will (Christian McKay) and Jane (Janel Moloney).

Director Paolo Virzi has a tough balancing act. How does one make a film about elderly people, especially when one of them (John) has Alzheimer’s, yet keep it lighthearted enough to interest an audience, but serious enough to not be insulting? It may not be possible to do so, but give Virzi credit for striking quite a few correct notes amidst the discordant ones.

Give this one some time, as it doesn’t start well. John and Ella essentially run away from home, as Will discovers when he drops by their house, wonders where they’ve gone, discovers the Leisure Seeker is gone, and freaks out. Cut to John and Ella on the road with John at the wheel. John may not have all his marbles, but after a few minor mishaps, he’s on autopilot. We learn that he was once a brilliant literature professor who adored Hemingway and that Ella was the dutiful faculty wife. She knows that his memory is on the cusp on the road to no return, so why not head for the Florida Keys to see Papa Hemingway’s home and give the old boy a late-in-life thrill? Along the way they can drive through Ella’s native South Carolina.

The early parts of the film have the feel of a geriatric caper film, but eventually it turns more poignant. Not much in this film would work were lesser actors in the lead roles. Sutherland masterfully portrays dementia as akin to a failing light bulb; that is, he blinks in and out. There are moments in which Ella wakes up, her husband is lucid, and memories flow. Then the light wobbles and fades. Ella has issues of her own; she’s very sick, hides her illness beneath a too-young-for-her wig, and she continues to play her role as John’s booster—though he doesn’t really require it—because it’s what she knows. Together Sutherland and Mirren show a side of older folks that’s seldom depicted well—an age-burnished affection made manifest by mutual respect, mannered interactions, and even physical attraction. Credit Virzi also with delving into their challenges: incontinence, blurted out secrets, a pharmacy of pills to swallow, blathering on in front of people who don’t care, and wondering if it’s time to pack it in.

It must also be said that at times the script has more holes than the Leisure Seeker’s exhaust system. We have, for instance, the clichéd sibling rivalry. Will is the son who never really got his act together, but he lives in the same town and bears the brunt of eldercare. Jane, by contrast, is the calm golden girl who followed in her father’s footsteps and is now also a literature professor. Will wants to kibosh the road trip and spends much of the film screaming at his mother to tell him where they are; Jane tells him to chill and let them have their last fling. It apparently never occurs to either of them that they know the license number and could simply ask the police to look for a rusty Winnebago with Massachusetts plates! Moreover, in road trip films the central issue is always whether or not the destination is achieved, a yes/no situation that invariably leads to padding material to stretch it to movie length. You can probably predict that some of this falls considerably shy of poignant and also occasionally stretches credulity as well as time. Cameo appearances by Dick Gregory and Dana Ivey are only loosely stitched to the film’s fabric. Of course, there is also the issue that a film seeking to be three things—comedy, romance, and drama—usually ends up having an identity crisis.

Still, it is a genuine pleasure to see two amazing actors transcend script issues. Sutherland is convincing in his portraying Alzheimer’s on the verge of when the on-off button will fail to bring light. As one whose mother made this tragic descent, I can attest that Sutherland stirred my helplessness as an observer. Mirren is equal parts determination, frustration, and resignation. Her occasional anger also rings realistic. Call it inappropriate, but it's often infuriating to be around those who forget something as soon as you say it. If you’re wondering, Mirren's South Carolina accent is better than that of a Charleston native! I could have done with about half of McKay’s histrionics, though.

Is this a good film? Objectively, it’s only half good and part are rather lame. But if you have dealt with memory loss in any form, you’ll see plenty that you recognize. It’s also nice to see older people that have agency and, yes, even sex on occasion.

Rob Weir