KLARA AND THE SUN (2021)
By Kazuo Ishiguro
Random House/Penguin, 307 pages
★★★★★
There are reasons why Japanese-born British author Kazuo
Ishiguro has won most of the major awards a novelist can, including the
Whitbread, the Arthur C. Clarke, the Man Booker, and a Nobel. He manages to be
an amazing stylist without being pretentious, and he never repeats himself thematically.
Consider just a few of his subjects: the Sino-Japanese War (When We Were
Orphans), the British aristocracy (Remains of the Day), and a
dystopian in which children are raised to become organ donors (Never Let Me
Go).
In Klara and the Sun, Ishiguro turns to
what we construe to be the very near future. AI (Artificial Intelligence) has reached
advanced levels, and genetic engineering has become commonplace. The titular
character is an AF (Artificial Friend), which are all the rage as companions
for children bred for superior intellect. Klara has not yet found a home
because she’s an older model. There’s something about her, though, that
attracts the eye of young Josie, who doesn’t have many friends other than Rick,
who has never been “lifted” and comes from a difficult family situation. In
addition, Josie’s sister, Sal, is deceased. Chrissie, Josie’s ambitious mother,
wants her daughter to get one of the sleek new B3 models, but Josie insists on
buying Klara.
For an android like Klara, the Sun is godlike, as it
replenishes her batteries. She’s a bundle of wires and programming capable of
high-level thinking, but Klara is essentially a child, as she knows little of
the world except what she observed through the store display window. You will
be charmed by Klara, how she learns, what she “feels,” and her skewed look at
the world–phones are “oblongs,” for example, and she misreads illogical social
situations. Among Klara’s impressions is that the “Cootings Machine”–the name
on a piece of construction equipment–is evil and environmentally destructive.
Klara is an excellent AF to Josie, who is often ill, perhaps
as Chrissie fears, mortally so. We also learn that Chrissie’s ex-husband, Paul,
has concerns about how his daughters have been raised. He comes off as a cross
between a hippie, a survivalist, and a Luddite, but maybe he’s not a naïf. He
is particularly concerned when Chrissie begins taking Josie to a painter named Calpaldi,
who also did Sal’s portrait before she died. Is more than painting taking place
inside his studio?
Klara and the Sun is a fascinating exploration of
“humanity.” The novel reminded me of a Star Trek Next Generation episode
titled “The Measure of a Man” in which scientist Bruce Maddox wishes to
disassemble Data to see if he can be replicated. After all, Data is just a
“machine.” Is Klara just a “’bot?” How do we measure humanity? Klara learns, is
self-aware, and her programmed emotions are often superior to those fired by
biological receptors and neurons. What about GMOs like Josie? Does live birth
make her more human than a manufactured sentient being? Once DNA is altered, is
a biological child still fully human? Who cares more for Josie: her status-obsessed
mother, or a robot who implores the Sun to heal Josie and engages in an unusual
escapade she thinks will help? When Calpaldi opines that, “there’s nothing so
unique” about humans that “our modern tools can’t excavate, copy, and
transfer,” is he offering a dose of harsh truth, or setting the stage for the
end of the Anthropocene?
What a book! Even if you think you don’t like science
fiction, Ishiguro will take you on an intellectual journey that raises many
questions and trusts readers to answer them. Many years ago, novelist Philip K.
Dick queried whether androids had souls in the ways humans conceptualized them.
If consciousness is a measure, Ishiguro suggests that placing robots in the
service of a biological species might be a form of enslavement. Is it okay to
discard/dismantle a robot whose neural networks continue to function? In our
time, much has been about climate change, plague, and war. Maybe this is our version
of Data’s dilemma and Calpaldi’s assertion.
As only the most confident writers can do, Ishiguro prefers
open-ended possibilities to dogmatism. If, however, we believe what AI boosters
say, the conundrums Ishiguro posits are ones that will soon jump from the pages
of science fiction and into the realms of ethics and politics– two “human”
pursuits that historically have not been good friends, AF or biological.
Rob Weir