Turner and Constable
Clark Museum of
Art (Williamstown, MA)
Through March 10,
2019
John Constable |
JMW Turner |
Few 18th century British artists have gained as
much fame–much of it posthumous–as John Constable and J.M.W. Turner. They are
displayed side by side in a current exhibit at the Clark Museum of Art. Alas,
the artists' reputations exceed the merits of the show.
Constable |
Of the two, John Constable (1776-1837) was the more
conventional in both his painting and in his private life. (He did go through a
reckless spending spree around the time his beloved wife Maria died in 1828.)
Constable is known for his genre landscapes and dramatic skies. Depending on
how you feel about depictions of wind in the trees, Constable is either the
master of that technique or Marcel Marceau with a paintbrush.
I confess that Constable is not among my favorite artists.
Too much of his work is of grand houses in sylvan settings that look like
treatments for a Downton Abbey
spinoff. Constable also romanticized the British countryside. For me, his
watercolors are more inspiring that his oils. In the Clark show, his small
studies and downsized oils intrigue more than his larger canvases.
J(oseph) M(allard) William Turner (1775-1851) was, simply, a
weird individual who was short on social graces. Call him the enfant terrible of his generation. His
mother was mentally ill and many have speculated that "William," his
chosen name of address, may have inherited some of her instability. He was a
loner who never married, though he did father two children by his housekeeper.
Turner was constantly short of money and often lived amidst hand-to-mouth
grime. He also shocked his contemporaries with his crude behavior.
There was no doubting his talent and he gained entry into
the Royal Academy of Arts, his personal quirks notwithstanding. If you see a
conventional-looking Turner, chances are good it was painted for a Royal
Academy show. My favorite works of his are his moody oils and his loose and
gauzy watercolors. Turner's signature works often sport low contrast tones that
jump to life because of a splash of contrasting hue–a red smudge or bright side
lighting in a dark room, for instance. Turner may have been mad or eccentric,
but he left behind an astonishing number off canvasses.
That last remark is the foundation for my summary of the
Clark show: too many Constables and not enough Turners. The lack of Turners
makes the overall show feel as if it is cut from the same monochromatic cloth.
The opening display is an unintended metaphor for the show's deficiencies. The
first is a beach scene from Constable titled "Yarmouth Jetty." (See
above) It is splendid in all the ways Constable tends to be. As is often the
case, he violated the rule of thirds by making a dramatic sky dominate
two-thirds of the frame. Sailing ships lean into the picture and the red-capped
draughtsman draws the eye to the left foreground.
Contrast this with a Turner beach scene, "View off
Margate, Evening." (See above). The two approaches to ships on the horizon
couldn't be more different. Notice the red and black tones in the lower right
that look as if Turner was attacking his canvas rather than painting it. Notice
also the orange sail leaning right and wispy figures on the beach leaning left.
On the other side of the canvas we see what appears to be a cargo ship, but you
have to look closely or you might see it as a ghost image. Turner laid on paint
thickly in some parts of the image and barely skimmed the surface with color on
other parts. Constable pictures always look complete; Turner's look as if he
has just stepped back to contemplate what comes next. They also move, whereas
most Constables are more static.
Constable |
Turner |
Would that there were more side-by-side moments in the Clark
show. It's a small exhibit that takes up just two rooms and oddly enough, it
makes the absence of diversity more noticeable. It's as if one could exit after
seeing the first two paintings, as they vividly highlight the differences
between Constable and Turner. I will credit the Clark for choosing some smaller
Constables to contemplate. I was drawn to his "Sketch for the Opening of
Waterloo Bridge," probably because its energy and disorder reminded me
more of Turner. Even then, I preferred Turner's "Tummel Bridge,
Perthshire." Okay, I admit that might be personal, as I've crossed that
Scottish bridge. (I assume/hope it has had structural improvements since Turner
visited in 1801!)
I would not call the current Clark exhibit a failure. It's more
like a much anticipated restaurant meal that turns out to fine, but not
special.
Rob Weir
No comments:
Post a Comment