By now you've probably heard of Rachael Dolezal, the woman exposed for passing as black. She was
good at it; in 2014-15 she was actually the president of Spokane, Washington's
NAACP chapter. In truth, she lied about having an African-American father and
is of Czech, German, and Swedish heritage. Childhood pictures emerged, which
showed her with braces, straight hair, and be-freckled pale skin. Her
"black" public presence is the product of a good hairdresser and
Mystic Tan spray-on.
These revelations led to savaging and shaming; that's what
we do in a culture where hard journalism has given way to gotcha pillorying. So
now Dolezal, who got a full scholarship to Howard University, passed herself
off as an expert on black art, and once taught Africana Studies, is now jobless
and, if she is to be believed, soon to be homeless. Plenty of signs indicate
she may have issues beyond her rigid Christian homeschooling, including
allegations that Dolezal plagiarized some of her art. Who knows? I'm not a
psychologist. But my social/historical, perspective leads me to opt out of the
public shaming game.
Dolezal now calls herself "transracial." Before
you dismiss this as an attempt to divert attention from her lies, there's the
inconvenient fact that she's right, even if you conclude that her only true
artistry is of the con variety. Strictly speaking, nearly every human being on
this planet is a racial mutt. Insofar as can be determined, Homo sapiens originated in Africa and/or
Asia, but we don't have to go that far back in history. About 4% of today's
Caucasian Americans have some African ancestry; no matter how "white"
they (or their Klan robes) appear. If you want to know the true legacy of
slavery, consider that 25% of the genomes in the average "black"
person in the United States are European. Southern racial "purists"
never needed to protect white women from black men; they needed to protect
black women from white male rapists.
Clarence King |
Now gaze upon Walter
Francis White (1893-1955). From 1931-1955, he was he executive secretary
of the national NAACP. Though he looks as "white" as his name, he was
a "negro" because five of his thirty-two great-great-great
grandparents were African American. He flunked the single-drop rule and had to
attend a black college in Atlanta. White surely could have "passed" for white, but chose instead to
identify as black—again like Dolezal.
Walter F. White |
Now let's look at a few more pictures. W. E. B. DuBois
always gets the lion's share of credit for founding the NAACP, but he was only
a cofounder. Among the other founders
were social reformer Lillian Wald
and civil rights activist Henry
Moskowitz. They were Jews and, in the early 20th century, Jews
weren't viewed as entirely "white."
Lilliian Wald |
Henry Moskowitz |
Remember: the NAACP stands for National Association for the
Advancement of Colored People; the
terms "black," "negro," or "African American" are
notable by their absence. "Colored" meant anyone not considered
"white," the latter term being the ultimate fiction. If you think you
are "white," look in the mirror and tell how much you resemble a
snowflake. Maybe then you'll come around to the point-of-view of journalist Oscar Garrison Villard or the socialist
labor activist William English Walling.
Not only do they look white, they passed every test for being white of their
day. Yet both were cofounders of the NAACP. Why? Because they thought
discrimination was wrong and felt the sooner America stopped inventing
"race," it could dispense with racism.
Oscar Villard |
William English Walling |
So look again at Rachel Dolezal. Is she black? White? I'm not
defending lying or self-aggrandizement, but perhaps Dolezal can help us focus
on what matters and what doesn't. Hey–maybe she can become a rapper. Apparently
that's one area of American culture where it's fine for "white" folks
to pretend to be "black" and profit from it. What makes that any
better than what Dolezal did?
No comments:
Post a Comment